Knowledge-based structure prediction of MHC class I bound peptides: a study of 23 complexes.

BACKGROUND The binding of T-cell antigenic peptides to MHC molecules is a prerequisite for their immunogenicity. The ability to identify binding peptides based on the protein sequence is of great importance to the rational design of peptide vaccines. As the requirements for peptide binding cannot be fully explained by the peptide sequence per se, structural considerations should be taken into account and are expected to improve predictive algorithms. The first step in such an algorithm requires accurate and fast modeling of the peptide structure in the MHC-binding groove. RESULTS We have used 23 solved peptide-MHC class I complexes as a source of structural information in the development of a modeling algorithm. The peptide backbones and MHC structures were used as the templates for prediction. Sidechain conformations were built based on a rotamer library, using the 'dead end elimination' approach. A simple energy function selects the favorable combination of rotamers for a given sequence. It further selects the correct backbone structure from a limited library. The influence of different parameters on the prediction quality was assessed. With a specific rotamer library that incorporates information from the peptide sidechains in the solved complexes, the algorithm correctly identifies 85% (92%) of all (buried) sidechains and selects the correct backbones. Under cross-validation, 70% (78%) of all (buried) residues are correctly predicted and most of all backbones. The interaction between peptide sidechains has a negligible effect on the prediction quality. CONCLUSIONS The structure of the peptide sidechains follows from the interactions with the MHC and the peptide backbone, as the prediction is hardly influenced by sidechain interactions. The proposed methodology was able to select the correct backbone from a limited set. The impairment in performance under cross-validation suggests that, currently, the specific rotamer library is not satisfactorily representative. The predictions might improve with an increase in the data.